Through the Bible with Les Feldick, Book 28
LESSON ONE * PART I
ORDER AND MEANING OF THE LORD'S TABLE
I CORINTHIANS 10:18 - 11:30
Now as we begin a new book we'll still be in I Corinthians Chapter 10.
Every so often I tell you that we are nondenominational and we never try to
attack anyone in our teachings, but rather just teach as the Holy Spirit leads
us. When we first started the television ministry I guess my biggest fear was
all the hate mail we would get, but in the six years we have been on the air we
have only received two letters like that, and they weren't all that bad. So I
have to just count it a real blessing that we're not making people downright
angry. If you disagree with me, that's your privilege, the Word of God is such
that I think we can have some differences of opinion, and still not be heretics
or anything like that. I have to totally depend on how the Holy Spirit opens it
to my understanding, and not how some would have me to teach it.
Now in the Book of I Corinthians, as we have been stressing ever since we
started teaching this little letter, evidently from Chapter 7 verse 1 some
questions had arisen, and I think this is the clue for Paul writing this letter
of I Corinthians. Now granted it's all inspired by the Holy Spirit, and
everything that has happened has been directed by God's Sovereign Grace, but
nevertheless the human element always enters in as well. Now this is the beauty
of Scripture as it's all inspired of God. Every word has been directed by the
Holy Spirit, and yet every author maintains his personality. In other words,
Isaiah writes from a totally different personality than Ezekiel. The Four
Gospels are from a totally different perspective than Paul's writings, and so
on and so forth, and yet they are all in a composite way authored by the Holy
Spirit. And so here in Chapter 7, and verse 1, the Holy Spirit inspires Paul to
write this, but yet it gives us the human element as to why he wrote I
Corinthians and it was in response to:
I Corinthians 7:1a
"Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me:..."
So what did they do? They had a whole ton of questions, and I can just see them
as they just put them down on the page, and were asking Paul, "What about this
problem, and what about that problem," and so forth. So this whole letter of I
Corinthians deals with problems that Paul does not commend them for, and he's
too kind to just out and out condemn them, but neither does he brag on them,
but rather Paul is just kind of backing into this situation so that he doesn't
flare up their anger, and put them into a place where he can't deal with them.
And yet he is not going to agree with all of their problems, and we know the
reason is that they are still so carnal. Remember they are the most carnal of
any group that Paul deals with. Even here in Chapter 10 in their practicing of
what we call the Lord's table, or the communion service, or whatever your
particular denomination may call it, the Corinthians had made it a problem.
They were having all kinds of things going on that should have never taken
place in the Church, and Paul has to address it.
Now we just came out of the situation of eating meats that had been offered to
idols. And there again that tells us that the Corinthians were having to deal
with things that you and I know nothing of. You know we're not living in a
culture where people have offered meat to idols in some pagan temple, and then
have it end up in our butcher markets. And then when we buy meat have to
wonder, "Well, has this come from that pagan temple?" We're not up against
that, but the Corinthians were, and even before that they were going to law
with one another, they were suing each other in the pagan courts. Paul says,
"That's not the way you do things when you are a believer." And so the whole
Book of I Corinthians is dealing basically with problems that were besetting
the Corinthian Church. Now we touched on verse 16 in our last lesson, but let's
look at it again.
I Corinthians 10:16,17
"The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion
(or fellowship) of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it
not the communion (or fellowship) of the body of Christ? For we being
many are one bread, and one body: for we are all partakers of that one
bread."
When we get into Chapter 12 we will see Paul make the analogy of the Body of
Christ being put together like the human body with all our various functions of
fingers and toes, and the rest of the body. But yet we're under one central
nervous system aren't we? Everything is centered in the head in our brain. So
also is the body of Christ, because He is the Head in heaven, and every born
again believer is a member now of that Body, and we're all members of each
other.
The bread speaks of much the same kind of thing, because you all know where
bread come from don't you? From wheat. What makes a bin full of wheat? Kernels.
I remember when I was farming up in Iowa, I would, every now and then, just
look at a 10,000 bushel bin I had, and would just stand there amazed that this
whole 10,000 bushel bin is comprised of individual kernels. All right, that's
the analogy. Every time you eat a loaf of bread, what has comprised that loaf
of bread? Umpteen kernels of wheat that were ground into flour, and then made
into bread. The analogy still holds. What are we as members of the Body of
Christ? We're just like that loaf of bread that has become a composite of those
individual kernels of grain. Now with that in mind let's look at verse 16
again:
I Corinthians 10:16,17a
"The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not the communion
(or fellowship) of the blood of Christ? The bread which we break is it
not (in picture form) the communion (or fellowship) of the body
of Christ? (Which is that group of believers) For we being many are one
bread,..."
Even that loaf of bread coming from several thousands of kernels of wheat, yet
in the final make-up it's one loaf. In fact let's even stretch our imagination
a little further. Within that one loaf of bread there may have been a composite
of wheat shipments from all over the United States that have ended up maybe in
a Kansas City mill where it was in turn ground into flour. So we have that loaf
of bread here in Oklahoma and where may some of that wheat have come from?
Ohio, North Dakota, Colorado, Kansas and so forth. But it all ended up as part
of that one loaf of bread. And so is the Body of Christ: we've got believers
in China, we've got believers in Europe, in America, and South America,
regardless of their background we are all members of that one Body by virtue of
the blood of Christ. We're blood bought.
I Corinthians 10:17b,18
"...for we are all partakers of that one bread. Behold Israel
after the flesh: (the nation) are not they which eat of the sacrifices
partakers of the altar?"
Now you want to remember that when the pagans set up their animal sacrifices,
it was the satanic counterfeit of what God had established to be the right way
with the nation of Israel. Satan established the counterfeit, and is the master
counterfeiter. So when the pagans offered their animal sacrifices, and then had
the meat from the temple taken to the market place or maybe given to the
individual who brought the sacrifice, where did they really copy this practice
from? Well from Israel, because Israel did the same thing. If Israel took a
sacrificial animal up to the priest, who could eat of that meat first? The
Priest did. But on the other hand if there was more than the priest could
handle, evidently it was within his power to designate who would get it, maybe
the individual who brought the sacrifice in the first place. So even the Jew
who brought the sacrifice could end up partaking of that sacrifice, and that is
what Paul is saying in verse 18. Now verse 19 and here Paul is going to bring
in the idolatry side of it.
I Corinthians 10:19
"What say I then? that the idol is any thing, or that which is
offered in sacrifice to idols is any thing?"
Now you know it's hard for us to comprehend Paul's thinking. On the one hand he
makes it sound like there's absolutely nothing wrong with eating meat offered
to idols. As far as Paul was concerned that idol was nothing more than dead
stone or wood, it could never have an effect on that meat so far as he was
concerned, he could eat it without compunction. But on the other hand he would
warn people that there was something associated with those demonic gods, and
these gods had power, and so there were instances where Paul says, "Don't eat
of it." And we're going to see that in the next few verses. But right here in
this verse Paul is saying, "That idol can't affect that meat, because it's
dead." But on the other hand the idol may be dead, but what about the power
behind it? Hey, it's not dead, and that's Satan. See? Satan works through
idolatry. Now verse 20.
I Corinthians 10:20
"But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they
sacrifice to devils,..."
Demons. Why did they sacrifice to demons instead of the true God? They didn't
know the true God. They didn't know Who God was. Remember back in the Book of
Acts? Let's go for a moment and look at it. I don't intend to do these things
when I'm preparing for this, but in Acts Chapter 17 we find the Apostle Paul
coming to Athens. And you want to remember Athens was a thriving city of
intellectual imports. They had all the philosophers, and good universities
today still study the Greek writers: Aristotle, and Homer, and Plato and all
the rest of these fellows. So Paul comes into Athens and now verse 16:
Acts 17:16
"Now while Paul waited for them at Athens, his spirit was
stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry."
In spite of all their intellectualism, and intelligence, and philosophy, did
they know anything of the one true God? Nothing. They were given over totally
to the worship of idols, and the mythological gods. And then just come on down
to verse 21.
Acts 17:21
"(For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent
their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new
thing.)"
But listen, did they every hear anything of the One True God in the new things
that they heard? No. It was just a rehash of another oriental god of some kind,
or another mythological goddess sitting up on some mountain top supposedly in
their minds at least. Now look at verse 23: I'm just doing this so you can get
the picture of these people among whom Paul is ministering.
Acts 17:23
"For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, (their
idolatrous worship) I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN
GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you."
Just like a fellow told me once when I was going through some real financial
hardships, and he knew I was. Boy, he came flying into my farmyard one day, and
the dust was flying as he came to a stop, and said, "Les, I was just going down
the highway and I was thinking of you. Have you ever thought of praying to St.
Jude?" "No." I said, "Why should I?" He said, "Well I'm a firm believer that
you plug every hole." And that's the way these Athenians were. I mean they had
all these gods and goddess, and all their worship, and yet just in case they
had missed one they set up a special one and dedicated it to "the Unknown God."
They knew absolutely nothing of the God of Creation. They knew nothing of the
God of Abraham, although the Jews had been in their midst for hundreds of
years. Now let's come back to I Corinthians again.
So these were idol worshiping heathens as we would call them. I don't like to
use the word `heathen,' because most of us in America think of heathen as those
that our missionaries ministered unto a hundred years ago. They would go into
the deep, dark jungles in foreign countries, right down into deep dark
paganism, and we still get that connotation when we use the word `heathen.' But
in Scripture the word `heathen' just means any non-Jew. Anyone not a Jew was
considered a heathen or Gentile. So keep your definitions straight. Now verse
20:
I Corinthians 10:20
"But I say, that the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they
sacrifice to devils (demons), and not to God: and I would not that ye
should have fellowship with devils." (demons)
Oh horrors, that's why when we get to II Corinthians Chapter 6, Paul says, "You
can't have fellowship with God and demons." There has to be that separation,
and here Paul is saying that so clearly. Also remember that Paul is building
his case for the communion table. Verse 21.
I Corinthians 10:21
"Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils:
(demons) ye cannot be partakers of the Lord's table, and of the table of
devils. (demons)" You can't. I think Jesus made the statement
Himself:
Matthew 6:24b
"...You cannot serve God and mammon." You can't have one
foot in the world, and the other in the Church, it just doesn't work like that.
Oh, you can get by for a while but you're miserable. Now verse 22.
I Corinthians 10:22
"Do we provoke the Lord to jealousy? are we stronger than he?"
Remember the argument that Paul is building is that they have to be
careful how they practice the Lord's table. In verse 23 we find Paul shifting
gears again, and here in this verse he seemingly changes the subject and drops
into something totally different, but it's still coming home to the effect of
the Lord's table, compared with fellowship with demons, and fellowship with the
Lord and His work of the Cross.
I Corinthians 10:23
"All things are lawful for me, (that's frightening isn't
it? How in the world did the Holy Spirit see fit to inspire the man to say
something like that?) but all things are not expedient: (now what does
that mean? Well, there was no set law resting on Paul's shoulders that says,
`Thou shalt not.' The Cross finished all of that. We're no longer under law,
but even though he is set free from law, yet is he free to do the things
contrary to the law? No. And when we say that we're not under law, but rather
Grace, I never imply that we are now free to do as we please. Remember Grace is
not a license.) all things are lawful for me, (so far as legalism is
concern) but all things edify not."
And again he is going to be building his case here that every believer has to
be careful what they do, and what they practice because there are people
constantly watching us. Paul does use the expression that everyone is a living
epistle.
II Corinthians 3:2
"Ye are our epistle written in our hearts, known and read of
all men:"
What does that mean? There are a lot people who will never pick up this Book
and read it, but they can look at you, and they can read. You are a living
epistle, and this is what Paul is trying to bring these Corinthians to
understand, that even though they were living in the midst of abject
immorality, and idolatry, and mythology, yet wherever those Corinthians went
within that Greek culture they were to be a living epistle. They were to be
something that the world around them could read, and understand. Now verse 24,
and remember he's still building to the practice of the Lord's table.
I Corinthians 10:24
"Let no man seek his own, but every man another's wealth."
Now in that verse the last word "wealth" is italicized which means it's
been added. That's unfortunate, I think it should have been left blank. This is
a hard verse to explain, but you know that Paul is not saying that you are to
try to get what the next man has, because that flies in the face of everything
that he teaches. So what I think he is really saying here is that we are not to
just constantly look for what's in it for number one. That's been the cliche
for the last generation or so. "What's in it for me," is what it's saying.
Don't be concerned about what you do for yourself, but be concerned what's it
going to do for my neighbors? How is it going enhance his situation, and that's
exactly what he's driving at. Now verse 25:
I Corinthians 10:25,26
"Whatsoever is sold in the shambles, (here I think Paul is
talking about the open market that we referred to earlier) that eat, asking
no question for conscience sake: For the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness
thereof."
Now I think we can get a little glimpse of verse 26 when Peter saw the sheet
come down in the Book of Acts. And of course the Lord was teaching Peter
something totally different, but it was the same analogy. Here came this sheet
filled with all manner of four-footed animals and creeping things and what did
the Lord tell Peter? "Kill and eat." Boy that was the shock of all
shocks to a good kosher Jew. What did Peter say? "Not so Lord, I have never
eaten anything common or unclean." But you see here comes Paul in I
Corinthians with that freedom that Grace brings even to the Jew, and that is,
you don't worry about whether it's kosher or not, the Lord has created it,
thank Him for it, and eat it. And that is where we are today. Now verse 27.
I Corinthians 10:27
"If any of them that believe not bid you to a feast, and ye be
disposed to go; (in other words you are going to respond to the
invitation) whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for
conscience sake."
Now if that same individual when he invites you to that feast says, "The meat
I'm serving tonight came from the pagan temple," then that makes it a little
bit different. See in verse 28:
I Corinthians 10:28
"But if any man say unto you, This is offered in sacrifice
unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it, (Why? Now you are going to
show him that you are not going to have anything to do with that which was
tainted by being offered to some demonic god.) and for conscience sake: for
the earth is the Lord's and the fulness thereof:"
But other than that, Paul says, if you don't know the difference go ahead and
eat, because there's noting wrong with that meat. Offering it to that idol
didn't affect the meat one iota. It's nothing but a dead, dumb idol. So it
always depends on the circumstances.
_______
LESSON ONE * PART II
ORDER AND MEANING OF THE LORD'S TABLE
I CORINTHIANS 10:18 - 11:30
Now before we continue our study let me say that we are nondenominational, and
this is the way that I have been teaching for many years. We have always taught
with the idea that people of course are active in their own local Church. We
are not competing with the Church, but rather hopefully are enhancing it, and a
lot of our folks are Sunday School teachers and so forth. In my teaching
environment I've always tried to stay on neutral ground, in fact I've learned
that if I try to have a class for example in a Baptist Church, then the
Methodists, Catholics, and Lutherans aren't going to come. So when we teach we
always try to have everything on neutral premises, because we want to reach
people from every denominational background. This Book is not a denominational
Book, but rather it is for everybody. Remember heaven is not going to be
divided by denominations, we are all members of the Body of Christ, and if
we're saved we're going to be in the same place regardless of denominational
handle.
Now as we ended our last lesson we were dealing again with something that is
not applicable for us living over here in America, but it is still a problem in
some areas of the world. And that is this idea that if something has been
offered to a pagan idol, then can a believer have anything to do with it? Well
you see Paul spoke his mind when he said as far as he was concerned that dumb
idol couldn't affect that meat, and he could eat it and think nothing of it.
But just like Paul taught back in the Book of Romans, eating ordinary meat,
perfectly legitimate meat, if there were some that had become vegetarians,
through whatever convictions, and if it was going to upset their Christian
experience by watching Paul not be a vegetarian, then what did Paul say? "I
won't eat another bite of meat as long as I live if it's going to be a
stumbling block to others." Well, it's the same way here with regard to meat
that had been offered to idols. He says, "If it's going to cause a problem to
the unbeliever, as well as to the believer, then I won't eat it." Remember
where we left off in our closing moments in verse 28:
I Corinthians 10:28
"But if any man say unto you, `This is offered in sacrifice
unto idols, eat not for his sake that shewed it,...'"
Even that pagan is going to be taught a lesson if he tells this Christian who
is now a guest at his table, "Hey, this meat is what I got back from the
temple," then the believer should reject it for that man's sake to show him
that he does make a difference. And on the other hand it could have been a
fellow believer invited to that same feast, and that young believer did not
have the strength to say, "This meat can't be affected by an idol," so for that
young believer's sake, don't eat it. And you can carry that into every aspect
of life. Anything that is going to cause a weaker believer to stumble, then for
goodness sake set it aside. Now I think the crux of this whole thing is wrapped
up in verse 31:
I Corinthians 10:31
"Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do
all to the glory of God."
And that's the only reason we're left here is to bring glory to His name. Even
in the mundane things that we think don't really count. Yes they do if we do it
as unto the Lord and for His glory, then that's the way God sees it. Now verse
32, and here is another admonition that fits just as well today as it did back
in Corinth in Paul's day.
I Corinthians 10:32
"Give none offence, neither to the Jews, nor to the Gentiles,
nor to the church of God:"
In other words, that verse divided the population of Corinth, or any other city
at that time, into three categories. We normally think of two, saved and lost,
but here Paul puts it in three. Because the Jew was still a factor to be
reckoned with when Paul writes to the Corinthians. Now a little later in his
ministry Paul's writings are a progressive revelation in themselves. Just like
the Bible is on the whole. Because you've certainly seen that by now, when you
come from Genesis all the way up through the scriptures, it's a constant
progressive revelation of things that were not revealed back there, but now
they are. Paul's letters work the same way. He works from a simple beginning,
and he comes on up and finally he'll end with those deep spiritual things that
the carnal believer can't comprehend. So here he is still showing that there is
a difference between the Jew and the Gentiles, and those Jews and Gentiles who
were members of the Body of Christ. Then to finish up the chapter:
I Corinthians 10:33
"Even as I please all men in all things, not seeking mine own
profit, but the profit of many, that they may be saved."
Now as you study Paul's letters I think you're going to become aware of one
overriding thought, and that is the man could never get lost people off his
mind. All that Paul could think about was lost people. People for whom Christ
had already paid their sin debt, people for whom the blood of Christ had been
shed, people whose lives were ready to be ransomed by virtue of His
resurrection from the dead. We never want to lose sight of the fact that when
Christ went to that Cross, when Jesus died that death by crucifixion it wasn't
just another crucifixion because there were thousands of those. It wasn't
unique in that respect. But what made it unique is that He was the Creator God
Himself Who took on human flesh to go to that Cross, so that on that Cross God
poured out all of His wrath for sin. All the sin from Adam until the last
person that will ever live in time, their sin was laid on Christ on that Cross
and God judged it. He poured out His wrath on Him. Which means that even the
vilest member of some mafia or whatever you want to think of as vile, lost,
wicked people, their sins are already atoned for. They are already paid
for. The only reason they'll go to an eternal doom, if they don't come into
salvation in the meantime, is because they rejected Christ's atonement.
That's why we maintain there's only one sin that will ever put a person out
in his eternal doom and that is rejecting the Gospel, because the sin debt has
been paid. That has been finalized once and for all.
And so this is why Paul just burned until his dying day that he might get the
Gospel of Salvation out to the lost people. And if each one of us would just
get a part of that same desire, we'd make a difference. I think personally the
world is too far gone. I don't look for a great awakening. I hope I'm not small
in faith, but I just can't see it. But IF every believer would burn for
the lost world like Paul did, then we'd still turn the world around. We could
turn this country inside out and turn the world around, but it looks like
believers aren't going to. Of course, it's all in God's providence and we
know that things have to come to their conclusion. But anyway, Paul's whole
desire any place he went was that lost people might be saved.
How many times do we think about it when we go our way, and I guess we're most
aware of the masses of humanity when we're on the road. You just see this
constant rolling of traffic into the city and out, and I don't care where you
go, it's the same everywhere. Highways just chock full of people coming and
going, and that's when I become aware of the masses of people and to think that
most of them are lost, and we could care less, seemingly. But if we could do
like Paul and just burn with that desire. Now come with me back to I
Corinthians Chapter 4 and drop down to verse 16.
I Corinthians 4:16
"Wherefore I beseech (beg) you, be ye followers of
me."
That's contrary to what most people think. Now come on over to Philippians
Chapter 3 and verse 17.
Philippians 3:17
"Brethren, be followers together of me, and mark them which walk
so as ye have us for an ensample."
Why does the Holy Spirit prompt the man to tell the world to follow him
rather than to follow Jesus? Because this man is of the same human make-up
that we are. He has the same failures, the same weaknesses, the same fears that
we do. He went into one of these strange pagan cities and do you think he went
in with a boldness and a facade that showed no fear? No! He trembled in his
boots just like we would, not knowing what kind of a response he would get, but
he went anyway. And that's what we have to do. It's a fearsome thing to take
the Gospel out to a belligerent world. But this is what he means when he says,
"Be followers of me," and that we burn with that same desire as we see more
people come to a knowledge of salvation. Now, if you'll come back with me to I
Corinthians and we'll go into Chapter 11. And remember, he still hasn't left
the thought completely of the Lord's Supper.
I Corinthians 11:1
"Be ye followers of me, even as I also am of Christ."
Now remember Paul writes to Gentiles in the world today just as surely as he
wrote to the Corinthians in his day and time. He says, "Be ye followers of me."
These are three verses right in a row that say the same thing. I Corinthians 4,
Philippians 3 and now I Corinthians 11. "Be ye followers of me, even as I also
am of Christ." Now Paul isn't setting himself up as the Savior of the world. He
isn't setting himself up as some god. Never! But what does he say? "As I follow
the resurrected, ascended Lord, you follow me." He makes that analogy
throughout his letters. In fact, let's go back and review for a moment. Let's
go back to I Corinthians 3. I know when I make statements like this I endanger
myself to those who say I make too much of the Apostle Paul. Well, I don't see
how I can because the Apostle Paul is that man that God designated to take
salvation to the Gentiles. And if God designated it, then I make no apology for
it. And this is why he is defending his apostleship in all of his letters. I'm
always stressing that Paul defends his apostleship because even the people of
this day were accusing him of heresy and being an impostor, because he didn't
actually walk with the Lord Jesus those three years, like Peter, James and John
did. But nevertheless, he still has to come back constantly and say, "I am an
apostle! I am the one who has received all these revelations!"
I Corinthians 3:10,11
"According to the grace of God which is given unto me, as a
wise masterbuilder, I have laid the foundation and another buildeth thereon.
But let every man take heed how he buildeth thereupon. For other foundation can
no man lay than that (foundation) that is laid, which is Jesus
Christ."
Christ is the foundation of everything we believe in and hope for. The
foundation and the finished work of the Cross. But who was the masterbuilder
that laid it out? Paul was! And that's why his letters are intrinsic to our
doctrine, because he alone was given these revelations with regard to this
Church made up of Jew and Gentile. Now Peter makes reference to it in his
little epistles way at the end of his life, you might say. But Peter knows
nothing of this in his early preaching. He absolutely has no concept of the
Body of Christ, this composition of Jew and Gentile. But this apostle has had
all of this revealed to him. Now let's go on the Chapter 11.
I Corinthians 11:2
"Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all
things, and keep the ordinances, (the things that have been delivered, that
have been taught by the Apostle Paul, and some of the other gifted men), as
I delivered them to you."
Now turn over a couple of pages to Chapter 15 when Paul says that "I delivered
them unto you." Now don't lose sight of the fact that these Corinthians have
heard none of this until the Apostle Paul came to town. It wasn't that someone
else had already been and had laid the groundwork and set the stage so that
this guy could just come in and take all the glory. No way! When he first came
to town there had never been a word concerning the Gospel of the Grace of God,
how that Christ had died and been resurrected. He says it so plainly here in
Chapter 15 and you've heard me say it on the program and in my classes in
Oklahoma, and you all know it forward and backwards - that if you want a clear
definition of the Gospel that will save a man, here it is:
I Corinthians 15:1
"Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you (not a
gospel but ) the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have
received, and wherein ye stand."
He's telling them not to get blown over with every little wind of doctrine and
every false teacher that comes along. You stand on this Gospel and you won't
have to worry about eternity.
I Corinthians 15:2a
"By which (that is this gospel) also ye are
saved..."
I always have to stop at that word. I had someone tell me years and years ago
that they wished I wouldn't use that word. It sounded too much like someone
they knew in town. And I said, "Now wait a minute. This is not a denominational
word. This doesn't belong to one group of people. This is a scriptural word.
You go all the way back into the Old Testament and what were the Jews
constantly told to be looking for? Salvation! The salvation of Israel. The
salvation of the individual. What does salvation mean? To be saved from
something!" And again, I've always used this simple analogy: you take some old
boy that's just about gone broke and is about ready to throw in the towel.
There's no way he can pick up all his debts. Some rich uncle dies and wills him
a whole bunch of money and all of a sudden he's back on his feet and is going
100 miles an hour. What do we say about him? "That old boy's estate was that
guy's salvation." It saved him from bankruptcy. This is the same word. We are
saved from an eternal doom and this Gospel is our salvation. Now let's read
on.
I Corinthians 15:2b,3
"...if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you unless ye
have believed in vain." (Know what you believe). For I delivered unto
you (what's the next word?) first (see how plain that is? This is
the first time the Corinthians have ever heard the Gospel and it was from this
one man.) of all that which I also received (Now you have to know your
Bible to know what Paul is talking about don't you? You have to understand that
when God zapped him off his horse on the road to Damascus and saved him, God
didn't send him back to Jerusalem to go and check in with the Twelve and come
under their ministry. He separated him totally from the Twelve and sent him out
into the backside of the desert and revealed these doctrines to him and then,
yes, he went to Jerusalem for 14 days and visited with Peter. But of the other
apostles he never saw one. And immediately Paul began his ministry amongst the
Gentiles. And so his ministry just continued and went west across Asia Minor
which is present day Turkey. They over the Aegean Sea and Greece, where Corinth
is. And here is what he received) how that Christ died for our sins
according to the scriptures."
Christ didn't just die for the sins of Israel, but the sins of these pagan
Corinthians, the sins of America, the sins of Europe, the sins of the Orient.
He died for them all. This was the fulfillment of God's whole design from day
one. That He would go to the Cross and take upon Himself men's sins. Now let's
go on to verse 4.
I Corinthians 15:4
"And that he was buried, (He had to be in order to prove
beyond a shadow of a doubt that He was dead. This was not some tomfoolery, or
beguiling whatever. He died. He was dead three days and three nights in the
tomb.) and that he rose again the third day according to the
scriptures:"
Again, the Sovereign God was in complete control. How can the unbelieving world
continue to ridicule the Book when they know from history, from archaeology,
that these Old Testament writers lived. They were real, they were flesh and
blood. We've found excerpts of their writings, whether it be on clay tablets or
whatever. They lived and we know those things were written a thousand, fifteen
hundred, two thousand years before Christ came. But here He came. And we know
that David wrote in the Psalms a perfect picture of the crucifixion. We know
that David wrote in 1000 B.C. concerning His resurrection. But it was in such
vague language that it took this Apostle to bring it out into the open. It was
all back there and that was why he mentions it . It was according to the
scriptures that the Gospel came about it and that He rose again the third day
according to the scriptures. Now that's the Gospel that he received and he took
to Corinth.
Now let's go back to Chapter 11 and we have it here again, that all the things
that Paul had instituted in the little group of believers. You want to remember
that none of these New Testament churches were in huge edifices as we see in
America and Europe and so forth. Where did they meet? They met in homes! The
average local church probably didn't have more than a common ordinary home
would accommodate. A dozen, two dozen, and if they had a huge home maybe they
could get 30 or 40 in there. But they weren't huge congregations, but
nevertheless, whatever they rested on, they had gotten it from the Apostle
Paul.
_______
LESSON ONE * PART III
ORDER AND MEANING OF THE LORD'S TABLE
I CORINTHIANS 10:18 - 11:30
Now let's pick up again in Chapter 11, and we'll begin with verse 2 where the
Apostle writes.
I Corinthians 11:2
"Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all
things, and keep the ordinances, (things) as I delivered them to
you."
In other words, go by what I have instructed because I am the Apostle of the
Gentiles, and of course, this was a predominantly Gentile congregation. I say
predominantly because no doubt there were some Jews in the early congregation
because the Scripture teaches that Paul would always go first to the Jew, and
then when he saw that he wasn't going to reap a harvest, then he would go to
the Gentiles. So I'm convinced in all his early little congregations there were
a smattering of Jewish believers.
Now in the next few verses we are going to deal with something that is as far
removed from us in America in this day and time as what we just talked about in
the previous chapters with meat offered to idols. And that is women in the
Church and their covering or not to be covered heads and so forth. And it is
one of those areas again that has certainly changed by virtue of customs and
environment, not that the Word of God changes, but I certainly think that
customs do. We know that a lot of the things that God mandated for Israel, for
example, was because of their national customs and the way God had taught them.
So we will take these coming verses with a little bit of a grain of salt. I'm
not going to take it as no longer being the Word of God but I do want us to
realize that there has been a tremendous change in the position and attitude of
men toward women in Christianity.
Now maybe just for openers before we read the Scriptures, I would like to share
a couple of quotes that are appropriate. You want to realize that Paul himself
was not anti-women. Paul in Romans Chapter 16 commends so many women who
helped him in the ministry, and he certainly recognized the fact that there was
a role for women in the Church. Now in this portion in I Corinthians when
it sounds like he is coming down kind of hard on the women, again, remember the
circumstances in Corinth being the pagan city that it was. It was still
probably closer to the Orient than what we call western civilization, and so
many of the things that were part and parcel of the Hebrew, as well as the
pagan attitude toward women, is probably epitomized in these two little
quotes.
Sophocles, a Greek philosopher back even before Paul's time said it like this:
"Silence confers grace upon a woman." Do you hear what he is saying? The
best thing that a woman can do is be quiet. Now that was the philosophers of
Greece. Now I'm not saying this to promote this, but rather I'm just saying
that this was the attitude that was prevalent when Paul was dealing with these
early Christian people. Now the other quote comes from the Jewish writings out
of the "Talmud," and actually the Talmud was really a commentary. But this book
lists several plagues that could be laid upon the Jewish people, and of the
several plagues here is one of them. Now you're not going to like this, but I'm
just trying to show you that this was the attitude prevalent when Paul is
writing. The Talmud says, "The talkative widow, and the virgin who wastes
her time in prayer are one of the plagues of Israel." Now we would never
dream of saying something like that today.
This backs up what I have taught for years and years, and I've made no apology
for it. Don't ever accuse the Apostle Paul of being anti-female, because it's
the Apostle Paul's doctrines that opened up the world of freedom to the women.
Christianity is really what set womanhood free. And as we come into these
coming verses, keep in mind that even today in the Middle East, a women that
is unveiled is open to anything. She can be opened to verbal abuse, and
snide remarks as she walks down the street, and she may be opened to various
types of attacks, but if she is veiled she can retreat into a world all her
own. And then even the most brazen of men in the Middle East will recognize
that that veiled women is not to be touched. So we have to take these cultures
into view as we now see what Paul is writing here, and what he's telling these
Corinthians believers is, "Be careful how you handle this situation since
the world is watching, lest they misinterpret." Now we're in the same
situation in many areas of things today. We have to be careful how we do
certain things lest the unbelieving world totally misinterprets our actions,
and totally accuse us wrongly. Now maybe as we come into the text you can see
what we are talking about. Now verse 4:
I Corinthians 11:4
"Every man praying or prophesying, having his head covered,
dishonoureth his head."
Now we still, except for the younger generation, adhere to that. Those of us
who grew up in a generation several years back wouldn't dare wear your cap into
the high school, for example, or you'd wind up in the principal's office. Well
that was discipline, and it's the same way today, as very, very few men would
walk into a church sanctuary with their hat on. I mean we just don't do those
things. Well you see, back here in Paul's day it again goes back to customs,
and so Paul is telling us us that it's just common knowledge that a man does
not come into an attitude of prayer or worship with his hat on. For the woman
it's the other way around. You don't expect a women to go into any kind of a
worship situation without her head covered as we see in verse 5.
I Corinthians 11:5
"But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head
uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were
shaven."
Now does that mean that women today have to wear a veil or hat or something to
cover their head when they go into church? No. I don't think the scripture is
saying that at all, but in the culture of that day for a woman to be out in
public with nothing on her head when they were used to the veil, what kind of a
woman would usually flaunt herself in that way? Well, the prostitute. They
would just remove these coverings from their head to unveil their profession.
Now naturally, if that is the mind-set of 99.9 percent of the population do you
see what an impact that makes? So Paul is dealing with it under those
circumstances. Now today we're not bothered with that, and so this is why I
think custom has completely changed our interpretation of some of these things.
But we're still going to look at it because it's still part and parcel of the
Word of God. Now verse 6:
I Corinthians 11:6
"For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but
if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered."
Now that's simple isn't it? If a woman realizes that it's certainly not
becoming to have her hair all shaved off, and again making her right down at
the same level as the prostitutes, what woman is going to do that? That's just
common sense. Now verse 7:
I Corinthians 11:7
"For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he
is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man."
And again that goes back to Adam. As Adam was created in the image of God, and
also as Adam was the first created, and the woman was created next, that's what
Paul says in so many words in verse 8.
I Corinthians 11:8
"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man."
That was the process in creation. Do you remember I stressed that when God
created Adam, where was Eve? In him! And then it was out of Adam that He
created the woman later. Now you see this is why God has ordained all the way
up through human history. That the husband was to be the head of the woman, not
as a slave master, but in the order of God's things this is the way He has
ordained it by virtue of Him creating the man first and then the woman. Verse
9.
I Corinthians 11:9-12
"Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for
the man. For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of
the angels. Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the
woman without the man, in the Lord. For as the woman is of the man, even so is
the man also by the woman; but all things of God." Let's go back to the
Book of Genesis Chapter 2 for a moment and tie this together.
Genesis 2:18
"And the LORD God said, `It is not, good that the man should
be alone; I will make him an help meet (or complement) for him.'"
Now we know that God at this time has already made the animal kingdom, and come
down to verse 19 and He's going to have Adam name them.
Genesis 2:19,20
"And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the
field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he
would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that was the
name thereof. And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air;
and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet
(or a mate) for him."
Now remember when I taught this, when we started in Genesis, I said can't you
imagine that Adam was seeing all these creatures come by him to be named, and
they all had their mates, no doubt the male and the female, and probably after
so long a time Adam got a lonely feeling and said, "Now LORD why? Why do all
these creature have a mate and I'm alone?" Well, God had already said that it
wasn't good for man to be alone. So now let's look at verse 21.
Genesis 2:21,22
"And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and
he slept; and he took one of his ribs, (I prefer to use the term side
chamber, which is also the same definition for that Hebrew word) and closed
up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from
man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man."
There was the process of Eve coming onto the scene. Now from here I always like
to turn to Genesis Chapter 5 to show this is exactly how it happened, that Adam
was created and was alone for a period of time, but that Eve was already inside
Adam to a certain degree, because she had to be, in order to keep Adam as the
federal head of the human race.
Genesis 5:2
"Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called
their name Adam, in the day when they were created."
So what does that tell you? Eve was in Adam, and she was part and parcel of him
even as God created him and named him Adam. Now you also want to remember she
wasn't called Eve until after the fall. But that was the process of creation.
God created Adam with Eve within him, and then sometime later He takes that
part of Eve out of Adam and creates the woman, so now he has his complement, he
is now complete, he is no longer alone. Now coming back to I Corinthians 11,
again we find that this is what Paul is resting on. That the whole order of the
sexes is not some modern phenomenon. This originated at creation. God created
the man to be the head of the women because she was created next, and that was
God's ordained way of setting up the home and family, and it holds to this day,
because God never rescinded it. Now I always have to emphasize, that does not
make the man a slave master. His wife is not a "go-fer" for him, but rather she
is a help meet, she is a complement, and men are to understand that. Now
looking at verse 12 again:
I Corinthians 11:12
"For as the woman is of the man, even so is the man also by
the woman; but all things of God." In other words they have come together
in a union now that puts them almost on an equal basis, but the man is still
the head of the union. Now verse 13:
I Corinthians 11:13,14
"Judge (make up your own mind) in yourselves: is it
comely (proper) that a woman pray unto God uncovered? Doth not even
nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto
him?"
Now again I think that goes back to the custom of Rome, and I think the men of
those days wore rather short cropped hair. Now verse 15:
I Corinthians 11:15
"But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her
hair is given her for a covering."
It's a blessing, and I think any woman would be the first to admit that to have
a beautiful head of hair is indeed a blessing. Now verse 16, and here Paul is
tempering all this. He's not just coming in with a sledge hammer blow, but is
constantly tempering his words to these Corinthians because he doesn't want
them to feel browbeaten, and return their feelings in rebellion. Yet he's got
to make some corrections, things have to be straightened up, and the word he
uses in Chapter 14 is, "Everything that is done in the local Church must be
done in order." This is the way God does things. He is a God of order, and
even in the Nation of Israel when the children of Israel were ready to move out
after camping over night, did they just pick up and go like a mob? No! I mean
they moved out like an organized army with all the tribes in their rightful
order. He's a God of order, and it was the same way in the Temple worship,
there were prescribed ways to do everything. And it's the same way in the
resurrection that Paul teaches in Chapter 15, and we'll be coming to that soon.
What does Paul say:
I Corinthians 15:22,23
"For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made
alive. 23. But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward
they that are Christ's at his coming."
Even the resurrection isn't going to be just a great big jumbled up affair, but
every man in his own particular order, so it's going to be an orderly
resurrection. Now verse 16:
I Corinthians 11:16
"But if any man seem to be contentious, (always causing
problems) we have no such custom, neither the churches of God."
Now again I think he is tempering the attitude of these people concerning the
hair cuts of the prostitutes compared to the hair cuts of the Roman citizenry.
He's basically saying, "Just don't do anything that makes the outside world
think that you believers here in the Church are a bunch of kooks." Now that's
the best way I can put it. Don't let the world think of your Church service as
something like a bunch of nuts, or you're somebody out there in left field,
because they are watching. Now verse 17, and here Paul is coming back to the
instructions concerning the Lord's table. And the Corinthians did have a
tremendous problem with the Lord's table, it was more than any church could
imagine today.
I Corinthians 11:17
"Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, (in
other words Paul is telling them that he is finding fault with them.) that
ye come together not for the better, but for the worse."
Paul is saying, "The way you're doing things is totally wrong. You are mixing
up things that I have delivered unto you. You're doing it all wrong." Now verse
18:
I Corinthians 11:18
"For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear
that there be division among you; (we covered that back in Chapter 1. And
remember the division was that some followed only Jesus, others said they
followed Paul, some Peter, some Apollos) and I partly believe it." Now
remember Paul is getting all this by hear-say. Now verse 19.
I Corinthians 11:19-21
"For there must be also heresies among you that they which are
approved may be made manifest among you. (Now here is where we're going to
deal with the Lord's table.) When ye come together therefore into one place,
this is not to eat the Lord's supper. For in eating every one taketh before
other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken."
Now wait a minute, the Lord's Supper now is nothing more than pieces of
unleavened bread, and a little cup of grape juice or wine. Now that's not
enough to satisfy physical hunger or to get drunk on. Right? So what was going
on? Hey, they were having a great big pot luck supper before they had the
Lord's supper. And most of the smaller rural churches still like to have their
pot luck suppers where people just bring in what they feel they're qualified to
bring, and everybody eats. Well the Corinthians were doing that ahead of the
Lord's table for an evening service. I think the reason it's called supper is
because the ancients practiced more or less like rural America does . The
farmer, when he gets up, wants a big breakfast; he probably won't eat all that
much at noon, but then in the evening is the big meal. Well it was the same way
back here, and so these Corinthians were used to their main meal being in the
evening. So before they observed the Lord's table they would come in with the
pot luck supper. And in the next lesson we'll get into what Paul meant when he
says they were using excesses at this pot luck supper, and that's what it all
amounted to, and why he had to correct them.
_______
LESSON ONE * PART IV
ORDER AND MEANING OF THE LORD'S TABLE
I CORINTHIANS 10:18 - 11:30
Now to get back to where we left off in our last lesson. But before we do, I
just want to say this is an informal Bible study, and we want people to just
study the scriptures, and we like to do it in an atmosphere like we do in our
Bible studies here in Oklahoma, with a cup of coffee, or other refreshments,
and a table where you can take notes if you like. And we trust that many of you
are joining with us in Bible study as we know you are. Remember all we're
doing is trying to get folks to search the Scriptures and see what the Book
really says, and just as important, what it doesn't say.
In our last lesson we were studying about the Lord's Supper and how Paul was
having to upbraid the Corinthians because they were abusing it. And remember
before they would have the official Lord's supper of unleavened bread, and the
communion cup, they would have a pot luck supper. Now again remember the
circumstances. You see that's what makes the Bible so interesting.
Historically, and environmentally everything makes a difference with the
circumstances. The Corinthian believers were a make-up of a few Jews, more than
likely more Gentiles, but from the whole strata of society. Now naturally, in
that day and time what kind of people were at the bottom of the totem pole
socially? Slaves. Bond slaves, and then of course you had your wealthy merchant
men who probably had ships out at sea, and Corinth was their home base.
So you have this whole cross-section of society even within that little
congregation. So they would have this potluck supper, and people being people,
the bottom echelon people would bring what they could afford, and maybe some of
them couldn't afford anything, but they were free to come. Come on up through
the scale, and people bring various levels of food and so forth, but what do
you suppose the wealthy brought? They brought the best wines, meats and
vegetables because they could afford it. Now I can imagine, before Paul writes,
that the poor people were just gorging themselves with the things that the
wealthier people were bringing. They had never tasted wine so good so they just
guzzled it. They were becoming gluttonous, and drunk. And then in verse 22:
I Corinthians 11:22
"What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise
ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you?
shall I praise you in this? I praise you not."
It would indicate that the people were also separating themselves during the
potluck supper, and the wealthy were saying, "You're not going to eat the good
food that I've brought or drink our good wine. You go have your own table."
Well that's the furthest thing from what the Church is supposed to be. So they
were dividing themselves now according to their status in the culture, and Paul
is shocked, and says, "In the first place, you didn't come to Church to fill
your bellies with food and drink," but this was what they were doing, abusing.
Now there is nothing wrong with a potluck supper once in a while, because I'm
not one of these who say you can't eat when you come together as believers. In
fact, I think that is one of the highlights of our classes here in Oklahoma,
and even here at the studio. After an hour of teaching we take a coffee break,
and these gals bring out the best that there is. So all of our classes enjoy
these little breaks, and it's also a time of fellowship, and there is nothing
wrong with that. But the Corinthians were abusing all of that, and some were
even getting drunk. You might say, "Christians?" Yeah, no wonder Paul was
shocked and upset. Now verse 22.
I Corinthians 11:22
"What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? (Now
it's obvious he wasn't talking about the elements of the Lord's table, but
rather he was talking about their potluck dinner. He's saying if you can't do
it right then eat at home.) or despise ye the church of God, and shame them
that have not? (Do you see what Paul is saying especially to the wealthy?
He's saying how dare they flaunt their wealth by bringing all this expensive
gourmet food when they know there are other people that can't afford
anything.) What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? (What
does he say?) I praise you not."
So Paul is gently condemning them by just simply saying, "I can't praise you
for this kind of action because this is the way that it should not be done."
Now in verse 23 he is going to come in and give the real purpose for what we
call the Lord's Supper or communion table. And again I'm going to emphasize
that it has nothing to do with the salvation of these Corinthians. These
Corinthians are already saved, they are believers. Now for the purpose of this
table in the Church program.
I Corinthians 11:23a
"For I have received of the Lord..."
Now do you see what he says? He didn't get it from the Twelve in Jerusalem, or
from seminary, or some denominational big wigs, but where did he get it? From
the Lord! Let's go back to the Book of Galatians for a moment and look how Paul
received these revelations. This way you can compare Scripture with Scripture.
We've got to look at these Scriptures because they are tantamount to our
understanding Paul's apostleship.
Galatians 1:11,12
"But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was
preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was
I taught it, (by man, but how did he get it?) but by the revelation of
Jesus Christ.
Now you have to remember, where is Jesus Christ all during Paul's revelations?
In glory. And so everything that Paul writes concerning our doctrine today is
from the ascended Lord after His death, burial, and resurrection. And remember,
until He went to that Cross, and died, He was not the object of faith to the
main run of Gentiles. But once He had finished the work of the Cross, and
revealed His plan of salvation to this apostle then it becomes that
Gospel as he says in Chapter 2, "Which I preached to the Gentiles."
Galatians 1:15-17
"But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's
womb, and called me by his grace. To reveal (a revelation) his Son in
me, that I might preach him among the heathen; (Gentiles) immediately I
conferred not with flesh and blood: Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them
which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto
Damascus."
Do you see how the Holy Spirit is prompting the man to write definitively that
he had no contact with those Twelve men at Jerusalem. So when he speaks of
revelation he is always referring to that which Christ revealed from His
position now in the heavenlies. Now you come into Chapter 2 to a verse that I
just semi-quoted in verse 2. Paul goes up to Jerusalem now to convince the
twelve that his Gospel to the Gentiles was not connected with Judaism, and so
he says in verse 2:
Galatians 2:2a
"And I went up (that is to Jerusalem) by revelation,
(God instructed him. "Paul, it's time you go up and meet with the Twelve,
you go up to Jerusalem.") and communicated unto them (the Twelve)
that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles,..."
So everything that Paul has revealed to him to pass on to the Roman world was
revealed from the ascended Lord in glory. Now come back to I Corinthians
Chapter 11 and let's continue our study of the real meaning of the Lord's
table.
I Corinthians 11:23a
"For I have received of the Lord (by revelation) that
which also I delivered unto you,..."
By the time Paul writes the I Corinthian letter, the Church of Corinth had been
operating long enough to build the excesses. They had been going long enough
that they were getting all these kooky ideas coming in. Because this isn't what
he taught them at the beginning. This isn't how he taught them to practice the
Lord table. I imagine that when they got ready to have the Lord's table they
realized that they couldn't satisfy a whole day's energy with a little cup or
swallow of wine, and one little piece of unleavened bread. "My, let's start
bringing some food and we can have a real supper out of it." But that led to
excess, and so now Paul has to bring them some criticism. Looking at the verse
again.
I Corinthians 11:23-25
"For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered
unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took
bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, `Take, eat: this is
my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.' After the same
manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, `This cup is the new
testament in my blood: this do ye as oft as ye drink it. in remembrance of
me.'" Now let's go back to Matthew Chapter 26 and begin with verse 17.
Matthew 26:17-20
"Now the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the
disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, `Where wilt thou that we prepare for
thee to eat the passover?' And he said, `Go into the city to such a man, and
say unto him, The Master saith, My time is at hand: I will keep the passover at
thy house with my disciples.' And the disciples did as Jesus had appointed
them; and they made ready the passover. Now when the even was come, he sat down
with the twelve."
Remember when they ate the passover lamb back in Egypt, what was the position
of each of them at the table? Standing. So if they were to be standing to eat
the Passover lamb with their feet shod, why were they standing? They were ready
to go, and I don't think the custom had changed all that much, so when He sat
down there was a regular meal that they ate before they killed the Passover
lamb, if I understand Passover. Then let's come all the way over to verse 26.
Matthew 26:26-30
"And as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and blessed it, and
brake it, and gave it to the disciples, and said, `Take, eat; this is my body.'
And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, `Drink ye
all of it; For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many
for the remission of sins. But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of
this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my
Father's kingdom.' And when they had sung an hymn, they went out into the mount
of Olives."
Now why did I read this to you? Does Jesus give any doctrinal exposition on the
bread and the wine. Not a word. All He says in verse 26 is "...this is my
body." and in verse 28. ...this is my blood of the new testament,
which is shed for many for the remission of sins."
But we see no explanation or instructions on how to practice it from here on.
Now let's come all the way back to Genesis Chapter 14 and look at the first
example of bread and wine. And here comes this hard to pronounce name out of
Jerusalem. Who? Melchizedek, the high priest and king of Salem, which was a
little village that later became Jerusalem. And in order to get the backdrop,
remember Abraham had put together a little army out of his servants and had
recaptured the people that had been taken captive out of Sodom, and that
included his nephew, Lot. And he's coming back after their victory, and here's
a situation that's loaded of course with a lot of prophetic impact, and let's
pick it up in verse 18. And we find that this Melchizedek this high priest of
Salem, and remember He was not a high priest of the Jews, because that Nation
hadn't been formed yet.
Genesis 14:18
"And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine:
and he was the priest of the most high God."
Now that wasn't what they normally used in the sacrifices of Abraham's day. So
why in the world did Melchizedek offer bread and wine? Well, it was a subtle
prophecy. Oh, it was so subtle because what was the bread and the wine, as
Jesus administered it in Matthew 26, going to represent? The resurrection.
And that's what the whole idea of the Lord's supper is. It is to be a
constant reminder that every time we partake of that bread and that cup it is a
reminder of that finished work of the Cross. And this is the first time that's
it's explained. In fact one commentator that I've read puts it this way:
"This is probably the first time that Jesus is quoted chronologically in the
Scriptures, because the Four Gospels hadn't been written yet. Have you ever
thought of that? The Four Gospels hadn't been written so Paul couldn't go to
the Gospel of Matthew. But rather Paul's interpretation of the Lord's supper
came by revelation. And isn't it amazing how God does everything in His own
order, as before the Four Gospels were ever written Paul writes to the
Corinthians the very same words. Now read on in I Corinthians, verse 26, and
here is the doctrinal reason for the Lord's supper.
I Corinthians 11:26
"For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do
shew (or remind yourself of) the Lord's death till he come."
Now I'm going to point out two things. There is no stipulation from the
apostle as to how often a Church practices the Lord's supper. I don't care if
your denomination practices it every Sunday, that's your prerogative. If you
want to practice it once a year that's also your prerogative. Because the word
is whenever you have the Lord's Supper you had better have the right mind-set
when you do partake of it. And that is that you are reminding yourself that
Christ died, His blood was shed, and He arose from the dead. And that's the
only purpose of the Lord's supper, and it is to be a solemn experience. And
again, the Corinthians were so abusing this beautiful, beautiful picture in
type, by their indulgence with food, getting half drunk on too much wine, so
how in the world could they receive the impact of such a solemn service. So
Paul had to upbraid them and tell them to stop it, because it was a solemn
occasion. And as the last part of verse 26 says the Lord's table will not stop
until the Lord returns. Now verse 27, and here comes the apostles description
of what our attitude should be as we partake.
I Corinthians 11:27,28
"Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of
the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But
let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that
cup."
When it says, "But let a man examine himself,..." I think that's the secret to
behavior at the Lord's table. You don't examine the next person to you or judge
someone else, but just look at your own heart, and attitude. Am I right with
the Lord? Am I right with my fellow believers? And if you can say `yes' and
`amen' to that, then you feel free to partake. If you can't, you'd better
refrain, because then you are drinking and eating condemnation. Now verse 29.
I Corinthians 11:29
"For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and
drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body."
That is speaking of someone who partakes of the Lord's table with the wrong
attitude. The Corinthians were going into that supper with almost an attitude
of revelry, totally wrong. Many others of the Corinthians had a real thing
against someone across the room, and their enmity was just like sparks, and
Paul tells them that won't work. You can't take the Lord's table with that kind
of attitude. Now verse 30. Since the Corinthians were guilty of many things
that should have kept them from partaking:
I Corinthians 11:30
"For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, (in
other words God was already chastising them by taking away their health) and
many sleep."
What does he mean? They had died. Now there is a sin unto death recorded in one
of John's little epistles, and we won't have time to look at it today, but John
also tells us that we don't pray for it. Even though you think that someone is
awfully out of step, you never pray, "Lord take them out." That's not our
prerogative, but the Lord does have that prerogative. That if a believer will
not shape up, and if a believer continues to walk in known sin, then yes, God
will take them, because He's not going let anybody drag His name through the
mud. Now we know there are people who have made profession of salvation,
they've probably been members of the church, and they're doing the same thing.
And if the Lord doesn't deal with them, if the Lord doesn't chastise them, then
Paul teaches in the Book of Hebrews that they are not His children.
Hebrews 12:5-8
"...My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor
faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and
scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth
with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But
if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards,
and not sons."
So the Lord had been chastening the Corinthians because Paul says:
I Corinthians 11:30
"For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many
sleep."
_______
LESSON TWO * PART I
ETERNAL EXCELLENCE OF LOVE
I CORINTHIANS 12:1 - 14:3
In our last lesson we pretty much finished Chapter 11 of I Corinthians, and in
these next four lessons I hope to cover Chapters 12, 13, and 14. We're still
studying the questions that Paul had received from these Corinthians. I think
Paul is doing like I do even now, and that is, when someone writes and they
have several questions. then I answer the questions in the order that they
wrote them. We have been studying how he has been dealing with one problem
after another that they had evidently listed in this letter to him. Now when we
come to Chapter 12 he starts out the same way as I'm sure they had asked him
about spiritual gifts, and he is going to cover it as only the Apostle Paul, by
inspiration, could cover it.
I Corinthians 12:1a
Now concerning spiritual gifts,..."
Now it's rather interesting and I guess I had never really thought of it this
way until I spent the last 3 months just racking my whole being on these three
chapters, getting ready for this series like I never have before. And then it
suddenly dawned on me why Chapter 13 is the love chapter, which almost
everybody in Christendom knows. Why is it sandwiched right in between 12 and
14? It could just as easily have been back in the Book of Romans, or in
Ephesians or any one of his other letters, but why did the Holy Spirit inspire
the apostle to write the love chapter between these two chapters? I think you
will see in just a little bit, as we now take off, that this is the great love
chapter of the whole New Testament. And again it's in response to the problems
and questions that the Corinthian Church had. Remember, they were so carnal and
had so many problems. They were babes in Christ! They couldn't handle the meat
of the Word!
I Corinthians 3:1,2
"And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual,
but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. I have fed you with milk, and
not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are ye
able."
Now the Apostle could have just blasted these Corinthians on some of these
things, and especially Chapters 12 and 14. But instead he is not only preparing
the Corinthian congregation to accept Chapters 12 & 14, he is also
preparing his own heart and attitude lest he become too belligerent, and become
angry with them. So what does he have to do? Well the Holy Spirit has prompted
him to pen Chapter 13, and now let's look at it in that light. We want to
approach the things that are so controversial, even in the Corinthian Church in
Chapter 12 and 14, based on the love and the understanding and patience that we
see in this chapter. It is imperative that we look at Chapter 13 before I start
making any comments on the other two chapters because this was the apostles'
attitude as he approached these carnal Corinthians. Now let's look at Chapter
13.
I Corinthians 13:1
"Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels,
(Now I'm going to stop right there. That does not say that he spoke in the
angelic tongue. It is only a hypothetical statement. "If," he said
hypothetically, he could speak in the tongues of angels, and all the languages
of the world, if that could be the case) and have not charity, (love)
I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal."
Now what is he opening the door to? How are these Corinthians going to respond
to some of the things he's going to say in Chapters 12, and 14? Well, without
the attitude of love, faith, and understanding they're going to get upset and
angry. And I shouldn't doubt that some of my audience will also, but I guess
the Lord does everything in His own way because He's so Sovereign to the
smallest detail. Ordinarily when we leave to drive the 90 miles to tape the
programs we don't have time to look at our mail. We usually do that when we get
home. But this morning for some reason I went and got the mail and opened up
the letters quickly, and I'm sure that this one little letter was meant for me
this afternoon. It was a lady writing from Minnesota, and she said, "I've
been watching you and even though I'm from a background far different than
yours, and even though you say things that I can't agree with, yet never have
you offended me with anything that you have taught."
And this is my whole goal, that maybe I have to say things that are contrary to
what some have been taught, but I want to do it without making offense. And
this is exactly what Paul is saying. "I'm coming to you in the spirit of
love." And that has to be for all of us because when you approach some
person that you may know is as hell-bound as can be, don't ever go up to them
and say, "Look, unless you do such and such you're going to go to hell!" Hey,
you'll close their mind right now because you don't do that to people. But you
approach them with this whole attitude that the apostle uses of love, and
patience, and understanding, and not compromising the truth in the process.
I Corinthians 13:2
"And though I have the gift of prophecy, (which of course
he admonishes the Corinthians to look for because it was far better than other
things) and understand all mysteries, (now I wish I had more time. Even
when you go into the pagan religions of the world, at the very core of every
pagan religion, what do you find? Mysteries! The secrets of that evil religion.
And so Paul is really saying here that even though he had the gift of
understanding even the mysteries of the Oriental, pagan, idolatry religions
[and of course he uses the same word in his own letters] that He was revealed
the Mysteries of God. Nevertheless this is speaking of something beyond the
norm. So he says even if he had the ability to understand all the supernatural
mysteries) and all knowledge; and though I have all faith, so that I could
remove mountains, and have not charity, (love) I am nothing."
And you know the letter to the Church at Ephesus, back there in the Book of
Revelation, oh, they were so correct in everything. They had their doctrine
straight, they had their discipline in order, and yet as the Lord Jesus spoke
that letter to that Church, what was their major lacking? No love! It doesn't
do any good to have all your doctrine straight, or to have perfect discipline,
if there is no love then it counts for nothing. And so this is what this
apostle is bringing out to these Corinthians. He's saying, "Look, I'm going
to be coming at you about some things that I don't agree with you that you're
doing, but I'm going to do it in the spirit of love. " Now reading on.
I Corinthians 13:3
"And though I bestow all my goods to feed the poor, (how
could anybody do anything better than that?) and though I give my body to be
burned, (as a complete sacrifice to even the service of God) and have
not charity, (love) it profiteth me nothing."
Everything we say, think and do with regards to our family, our wife, our
neighbor, our business partners, whatever the case may be, it still has to be
based on this premise of love. Now understand of course that this term of love
is not the erotic kind that Hollywood promotes. This is talking about the agape
that is God-centered. And only the true believer can really have and exercise
this kind of love, because the unsaved world doesn't know what it is. They
can't comprehend it, but for us Paul says, this is out there for us to latch
onto. In verse 4 he begins to explain all the attributes of this one word
"love."
I Corinthians 13:4
"Charity (love) suffereth long, and is kind; charity
(love) envieth not; (and of course the other word for envieth is
covet. If you love someone you cannot covet what is theirs. That goes right
back into the commandments doesn't it?) charity (love) vaunteth not
itself, (In other words, love doesn't become arrogant, and put pressure on
the subjects of your love.) is not puffed up."
I Corinthians 13:5
"(Love) Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not
her own, is not easily provoked, (Now that doesn't mean it can never be
provoked, but it's not easily provoked) thinketh no evil; (True love can
think no evil. That's quite a statement isn't it? Now verse 6.
I Corinthians 13:6-8a
"(Love) Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the
truth; (Love) Beareth all things, believeth all things, (Remember
faith is the other word for believeth, so our faith is based on love. The
whole crux of the work of the Cross was the love of God, that He showered on
mankind when He sent the best that heaven had to the Cross of Calvary. So
far as Christ is concerned, God's wrath was poured upon Him while He hung
there, but as God's wrath was poured on Christ the love of God was shed abroad
on the human race.) hopeth all things, endureth all things." Then verse
8a: "Love never faileth:...."
Love will never let us down. We know human nature. We know that there are times
when we may love our neighbor and may do everything we can for them and they're
still going to take advantage of you. But over the long haul, love is going to
persevere. I think one of the best examples that I can remember is that of
President Abraham Lincoln. He was the epitome of this kind of Christian love.
At the height of the war there was a gentleman who had ridiculed Abraham
Lincoln before he became President. He ridiculed him to such a state that he
once admonished an explorer, traveling all over Africa looking for a gorilla,
"Why go to Africa when all you have to do is go to Springfield, Illinois"
(referring to Abraham Lincoln).
He also made other disparaging remarks concerning Abraham Lincoln, but besides
that, when Lincoln needed the right man to be his Secretary of War during the
midst of the Civil War, whom do you suppose he appointed? This man, Stanton.
And as time went by and Stanton served under the President, he continued to
give him snide remarks and had no respect for the man whatsoever. But Lincoln
never paid any attention to it. And then when he was assassinated, and as they
had laid his body in a side room, Stanton came in and through his tears,
weeping, he said, "Never has there been such a leader of men." You know, that
touches our heart and well it should. But what made Lincoln what he was? He
knew this whole attribute of Godly love. A man like Stanton never phased that
love. He continued to work with him, appointed him and so forth. And I think
this is what we have to understand, that a lot of times we don't get the
immediate gratification, but in the long run, what goes around, comes around.
Our love is still going to be a profitable thing. Now, let's move on.
I Corinthians 13:8
"Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they
shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be
knowledge, it shall vanish away."
In other words, the gift of prophecy, which he says back in Chapter 12 is the
one that is by far the best, it's going to fail. Well, how can something that's
so good fail? You see, before this book came into print, (the New Testament),
and Paul had already been winning hundreds and hundreds of people to Christ,
and congregations were being started, they didn't have anything written to go
by. None of the Gospels were even written yet. In fact, Paul will quote some of
the words of Jesus as we see them in the Gospels in your Red Letter Edition.
And so you know the man is moved by inspiration because they hadn't been
written yet. So here, while the world was waiting for God's Word to come into
print by way of the Four Gospels' account, by way of Luke's writing Acts and by
way of Paul's epistles, what did God have to provide to feed those believers?
Gifted men! And so the gift of prophecy was indeed by far the most important
because that's all those early believers had to go on. And here, he says,
they're going to fail. They're going to pass away. Why? Because the written
book is coming. And Paul, evidently by inspiration, knew that there was a time
coming when the Word of God would be in print for the New Testament believer,
even as the Old Testament was at that time.
Now let's move on to the next part: "whether there be
tongues...." I guess I'm going to have to emphasize something and it
will carry for all three of these chapters, and I'm going to do this just so
that people can readily understand that in the Greek whenever you see the word
"tongues" (plural) it always means a known language. A speakable, reducible to
writing, language. Now, the word `tongue' in the singular (and we'll point this
out as we go through the coming chapters, especially Chapter 14), when there is
no plural, speaks to those non-phonetic sounds, and that's all they were, just
sounds, that no one could reduce to writing. Even some of our most gifted
translators today, such as your Bible Societies, the Wycliffe translators,
whenever they have heard someone speak in one of these so-called unknown
tongues, they have never been able to pick out a single phonetic sound that
could be reduced to writing. Amazing isn't it? And so they are unintelligible
and that's why Paul said that if they are going to use it, they have to have
someone to interpret or translate it, otherwise leave it alone. Whatever, we're
going to leave that aside for now.
So now, he says, that this whole gift of speaking even in known languages,
being able to speak in almost any language that would happen to come up, this
gift will cease. Paul makes the statement in Chapter 14, verse 18:
I Corinthians 14:18
"I thank my God, I speak with tongues (plural) more
than ye all:"
Now that was early in his ministry. And from what we can gather from the time
he comes to the end of his ministry, he no longer practices it either. Now I
can best explain this ability to speak in languages from one of our guides when
we've been to Israel (and we're hoping to get him when we go again). When we'd
finished our tour, the whole group that was with us had fallen in love with the
guy. I asked him, "Eli, what do you do from here?" He said, "I've got a few
days off and then I pick up another group from Italy." I said, "Then what do
you do? How do you communicate?" He said, "I speak Italian." I said, "What if a
week after that a bunch of Japanese come?" He said, "No problem. I speak
Japanese too." He gave me his business card when we left and I sat down on the
plane and turned it over on the back side and there he had it down - the guy
was fluent in seven languages. He could take a tour from any one of those
countries and be able to converse with them as well as he did us.
Now that's what it means to be able to speak in tongues (plural) as we see it
here. And the guy had this but it wasn't a supernatural gift. I imagine he had
a talent and ability, but he still had to learn those various languages. But
Paul, wherever he went in his missionary journeys, and he went into various
tribes and dialects, didn't have to stop and take six months to learn the
language. He communicated with them. And even in Corinth, there was a multitude
of languages being constantly used because it was a center of East and West
trade. But whatever, Paul says the day is coming when this gift of being able
to speak in such as he was able to do, would also disappear. Why? Because God's
Sovereign. Talk to any missionary that's gone to the mission field over the
last many years, and have you ever found one that can go right in to Brazil and
speak Portuguese? Or into Bolivia and all of a sudden be able to speak the
languages of those Indian tribes? No! And so what do they do? They have to
study months and years learning the language. Because God has taken that whole
thing away.
When we were in Haiti, I would have given anything if we could have just been
able to communicate with those 700 Haitians who were out there in that crowd
every night, plus the fact that it went out over island-wide radio. If I could
have spoken that whole week in either Creole or French, I would have been
satisfied with either one of them. But I couldn't. I needed an interpreter. And
so Paul says this whole gift of tongues is going to vanish, as well as the gift
of prophecy and even this supernatural knowledge that was given to men, till
the printed page came in, disappeared. Now you want to remember that God gave
us this Book, which is supernatural in itself. And He has written it in such a
way, as one of the old Reformers put it, that every plowboy in England could
read the Bible and could comprehend it. So this is why all these supernatural
things are going to fade away: because the printed Word would now come in and
take over. Now verse 9:
I Corinthians 13:9,10
"For we know in part, (what does `in part' mean?
Partially, there's not a full knowledge revealed yet. Paul understood that.
That even with all the revelations that he had received from the ascended Lord,
he still did not have them all, as there would be more coming and we know now
that there were.) and we prophesy (or preach, particularly) in part."
He still didn't have the whole revelation of the truth of the Gospel of
Grace, this was only the beginning.
"But when that which is perfect (mature or complete) is come, then
that which is in part shall be done away."
Now here I have to use a simple illustration: everyone of you went through the
grade school and learned your arithmetic, your plain and simple combination of
2+2, the multiplication tables and so forth. How often do you still use them
today? I mean as such? Very rarely. But whatever mathematics you do use, what's
it all based on? Those first principles. I don't care how high you go in
mathematics 2+2 is still 4. Now it's the same way with scriptural revelations.
God starts with the simple, but He is constantly revealing deeper and deeper
truths. Now that doesn't take away the simpler part, but rather puts it in a
place where you're not constantly hashing it over because you don't have to.
It's just simply part and parcel of your make-up. Let me show you a verse that
I think points it out so clearly, and that would be in Hebrews Chapter 6 right
there in verse 1.
Hebrews 6:1
"Therefore (Getting off the baby bottle in Chapter 5, and
getting into the meat of the Word. You don't throw them away, or say they are
no longer true, but you don't need them anymore) leaving (just like we
leave grade school arithmetic) the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let
us go on unto perfection; (maturity, or that which is complete)"
Don't stay back there in the simplicity area of Scripture, but move on into
deeper things.
_______
LESSON TWO * PART II
ETERNAL EXCELLENCE OF LOVE
I CORINTHIANS 12:1 - 14:3
Now let's pick up where we left off in the love chapter, at verse 10, and
remember we had just looked at Hebrews 6 where Paul said, "Therefore leaving
the principles of the doctrine of Christ,..." In other words, there comes a
point in our Christian growth where you have to leave just spending all your
time on the simplistic or the elementary, and you move on into the deeper
things. Paul's writings are a progressive revelation just like the Bible is as
a whole. And so the Book of Romans and the first one of Paul's letters in the
New Testament are doctrinally elementary. I've said so often if people could
just understand two chapters in the Bible then they've got the battle over half
won, and those are Genesis Chapter 3 which records the fall of mankind, and his
problem with sin. And then Romans Chapter 3 which gives us the remedy for it.
So Romans is elementary, but then you see as the congregation was beginning to
grow problems arose, and we'll see that in our next study after we leave II
Corinthians and go to the Book of Galatians. Well, there again, problems such
as legalism were creeping in and Paul had to address that. But after we leave
Galatians then you see we move into what I call the higher doctrines of Grace.
Then we go into those deep concepts of the prison epistles, and that of course
is the Body of Christ and our position in the heavenlies. But you just can't
unload all of that at once, we have to take it progressively, and that's why I
feel the Lord has blessed our system of teaching through the scriptures, as
we've been doing.
And so Corinthians, as we've been stressing, is addressing problems in a
congregation that was so very carnal. They had not yet moved into the deeper
spiritual things, and of course they hadn't really been revealed except through
the gifted men who could preach it. But as we move on through from Corinthians
into Galatians then you will see what I'm talking about. Now let's get back to
the great love chapter, and we've been stressing that Paul puts this little
chapter, by inspiration, between two chapters that are even controversial
today. And the only way we can handle the controversy, as we're faced with day
in and day out, is on the basis of the love of I Corinthians 13. I do not
condemn people for practices that I don't agree with because that's between
them and the Lord. But it is my responsibility to teach what the Book says, and
not what I think. Now verse 11:
I Corinthians 13:11
"When I was a child, (Paul uses simplistic illustrations,
and I also like to use illustrations that even grade school kids can
understand.) I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a
child: (Paul was just as normal as anybody else, but here's where a lot of
people fail in the next portion.) but when I became a man, I put away
childish things."
Now I'm finding out that the older I get, the sharper I become at remembering
things that happened when I was five years old, and I think those of you who
are older than I am notice the same thing. As we become older then, yes, we no
longer play with the toys of a five or six-year-old, but have we forgotten
them? No! It's still part of our make-up. We still reflect back constantly. And
he says the same thing. "When I was a man, I put away childish things," but
does that mean he totally obliterated them from his thinking? Of course not.
But he is now a man and is no longer on the child level of activity. Now he
goes on to bring, I think, the thought that he is trying to bring through at
this point of revelations. And remember, he still hasn't had the revelations of
the prison epistle.
I think he probably got those revelations while he was in prison in Caesarea.
You remember, that was after all of his three missionary journeys through the
Book of Acts. And then he went to Jerusalem and got in trouble with the Jews.
He went under house arrest and protective custody with the Romans, and then
they had him in prison in Caesarea for a year and a half while they were
waiting to decide what to do with him. I think that while he was rotting away
in a Roman prison for a year and a half, God was revealing the deeper
revelations that would now come from the apostle's pen when he gets under house
arrest in Rome. And so this is the whole process of his revelation. He has
gotten enough to bring out the doctrines of grace for salvation and so forth,
but so far as that deeper doctrine of the position in the heavenlies
that we now enjoy, that hadn't been revealed to him as yet. But he evidently
had an understanding, or at least the Holy Spirit knew it, so he says:
I Corinthians 13:12
"For now we see through a glass, (or we look into a
mirror) darkly; but then face to face: ...."
Now the Greek implies an enigma. For years I didn't know what that was and I
don't expect most people to know it today. But an enigma is like looking in a
mirror and only getting an opaque reflection. In other words, if your mirror is
covered over with steam after a hot shower, you may see the overall outlines of
your face, but you do not see the little details that you'd want for putting on
your make-up or shaving or whatever. Now that's what the word "darkly" means.
Paul was seeing through an opaque view. He could tell that there was more out
there, but as yet he didn't have the revelations. And so he says, "Now we see
through a glass, or look into a mirror that's clouded over, but then...." Now a
lot of people think that this is referring to when Christ comes and it could
be, but I prefer to think that Paul is referring to when he would have the
complete revelation as we now have it. At the point he's writing I Corinthians
13, he didn't have it. And so he says, "We see through the glass darkly, but
then...." when he has the full revelation, and the Word of God has become
complete, then, he says, face to face.
He's not talking about my seeing my parents face to face, or you seeing your
loved ones or even seeing the Lord Jesus face to face, he's talking about the
fact that when the steam is wiped off of that bathroom mirror, he's going to
see himself as he really is. And so then, when the revelations are complete, he
says it will just be like having the steam wiped off the mirror and I'll see it
all and we can see it all. And this is why I think we should be spending more
time in, not just Paul's early epistles, but in his later ones. The Church
today needs to be taught what's in Ephesians, Philippians and Colossians. And
we're hearing precious little of it. That's the deep stuff. That's what makes
us grow and become mature believers. Now let's go on.
I Corinthians 13:12b
"...now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I
am known."
In other words, the revelations would be complete and there would be no more
explanations necessary. It is so obvious that when you start those prison
epistles, the revelations go completely beyond his earliest epistles of
Thessalonians, Corinthians, Romans and Galatians. Then verse 13. So after all
is said and done, after all the gifts and sign gifts have come and gone, only
three things abide and what are they?
I Corinthians 13:13
"And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the
greatest of these is charity."
Faith, hope and charity, or love. Now it's interesting, and I want you to watch
for this as you read Paul's epistles, that here and there sprinkled throughout
all the rest of his epistles, up will come these three words. Not always three
at a time. Sometimes it's faith and hope. Sometimes it may be faith and love.
But he will constantly be using these three words to the end of his writings.
Why? Because they will abide. They're not going to pass off like prophecies
did, tongues did, and some of these other things. And so he says, the greatest
of all three is love.
I think we have to look at the whole picture. Naturally, without faith you
cannot please God. One of the other absolutes I've always said is that without
the shedding of blood there is no remission. But you can also say that if there
is no love, it's the same thing, it's impossible to please God. So of the
three, faith, hope and love, even love is now the greatest. Now let's back up
and pick up with Chapter 12. With love as the basis, and even as I deal with
people who may not agree with me, I'm not going to get upset or angry with you.
I'm just going to simply say, "Look, this is the way I feel this is the way
the Lord has opened the Scriptures to my understanding and it's my
responsibility to teach what the Book says and not what some group may think."
Now look at verse 1. He is again, seemingly, referring to this letter of
questions. And he says the same thing like he did in Chapter 7.
I Corinthians 12:1
"Now concerning spiritual gifts brethren, I would not have you
ignorant."
I know your King James says "gifts." It's italicized, is it not? So I
think it would also be plainer if we would put an "s" on the word spiritual and
leave it at that. "Now concerning spirituals, or spiritual things." Now, here
again, we have to be so careful because, you see, when we talk about the things
in the realm of the spiritual, it's just not the Holy Spirit's power that we
are confronted with, but also the adversary. He also is among the spirituals.
Let me show you what I'm talking about. Turn to Ephesians 6, and a verse that
all of you know and you'll recognize it as soon as we look at it. This is one
of those letters that I was just telling you about. Here we're into one of the
deeper aspects, the fuller and more final revelations that the apostle Paul
received.
Ephesians 6:12
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against
principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this
world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Now what do you suppose? The word "spiritual" here in Ephesians is basically
the same Greek word, it's different case, but it's still the same Greek word as
what is translated the "spirituals" in Chapter 12 of I Corinthians verse 1. Now
he says:
I Corinthians 12:1
"Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have
you ignorant."
I'm going to have to jump across the page a minute in order to show you why I
jumped over to Ephesians, because Chapter 12 here in I Corinthians verse 10, is
interesting. Because here the Corinthian church is just beset with these
problems, one of which was they were abusing some of the gifts.
I Corinthians 12:10a
"To another (not to all) the working of miracles; to
another prophecy; to another discerning of spirits;....."
Now what does it mean to discern something? Well, to analyze it and put
it in it's right category. You intelligently look at something and determine
where this belongs and where that belongs. In other words, it had to be a
gifted person even in Corinth to separate the spiritual things that were being
prompted by Satan, and the spiritual things that were being prompted by the
Holy Spirit. Now let me show you what I mean. Let me use Scripture. I'm not
going to use my own ideas. Go all the way back to I John Chapter 4, verse 1.
This is just as relevant today as it was when John wrote it, or when Paul wrote
Corinthians. It is still the valid Word of God, and look what it says:
I John 4:1a
"Beloved (who is John writing to? Believers!) believe
not every spirit...."
Now remember the word there isn't capitalized. It's the small case "s" and so
it's not talking about the Holy Spirit, but it's talking about a spirit that is
involved with the very mind and mental attributes of man, as well as Satan. You
know the spirit of Satan is never capitalized either. And so here he says;
I John 4:1
"Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try (or test)
the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone
out into the world."
Now John wrote around 80 or 90 A.D., just before the turn of the first century,
and if the Holy Spirit inspired him to write that there were many false spirits
then, what do you think it is now? It's far, far greater and so we have to be
all the more aware of the gift of discerning these spirits. And I maintain that
every believer has the wherewithal to do that if you'll line it up with the
Word of God. That's your only criteria. You don't go by what some preacher says
or what I say, or what some seminary says, you line it up with the Word of God.
And now come back to I Corinthians Chapter 12 and I think I can show you one
area that Paul, as well as John, was talking about.
I Corinthians 12:1
"Now concerning spiritual gifts, brethren, I would not have
you ignorant."
God does not want the most uneducated believer to be ignorant. There's
absolutely no excuse for it. There are Bibles in every book store and
commentaries galore. But the Word of God can be understood by the lowliest, the
most uneducated in the world. God has promised it. He may lead someone to help
you understand it, but it is not beyond the comprehension of any believer. Now
verse 2.
I Corinthians 12:2
"You know that ye were (in the past) Gentiles (we
know it was primarily a Gentile congregation) carried away unto these dumb
idols, even as ye were led."
The word "dumb" there merely means that they couldn't speak. It didn't mean
they had no intelligence, it just meant they couldn't speak. And he says, "You
were led to those." Naturally, that's all the world knew at that time, except
for Judaism and Israel. Now verse 3.
I Corinthians 12:3a
"Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by
the Spirit (capital "S." That's the Holy Spirit. Do you see the difference?
Small case "s" is not the Holy Spirit. It's the spirit of man or spirit of
evil, but it is not the Holy Spirit.) calleth Jesus accursed:..."
Now we think, how could anybody ever do that? Listen, what do you suppose the
Jews did then and probably a lot of them do today? What do they call Jesus?
Accursed! What do you think Saul of Tarsus called Him in his days of intense
persecution? That accursed Person? How could you believe like that? You may
say, "Les, how can you be so blasphemous?" I'm not, I'm reading Scripture. And
I'll tell you why the Jews would say something like that. Turn with me now to
Acts Chapter 5. This is interesting and this is why I like to teach. This is
Bible study. I'm not going to roll out a sermon at you, we're going to search
the scriptures. And here Peter is still holding forth with the 11 and they are
still primarily dealing with the Jewish people, still confronting them with the
fact that the One that was crucified was their Messiah.
Acts 5:29,30
"Then Peter and the other apostles answered and said, `We
ought to obey God rather than men. The God of our fathers raised up Jesus, whom
ye slew and hanged on a tree.'"
Now let's go back to Matthew 27 and verse 5. Judas has just gone to the chief
priests and in verse 4 he has admitted he has betrayed innocent blood. And now
verse 5
Matthew 27:5
"And he (Judas) cast down the pieces of silver in the
temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself."
Now come all the way back to Deuteronomy and you'll see what I'm
driving at. Deuteronomy 21 and here is why Jews, with a straight face and
conscious, would accuse or curse Jesus because He had been hanged on a Cross.
Deuteronomy 21:22,23
"And if a man have committed a sin worthy of death, and he be
put to death, and thou hang him on a tree: His body shall not remain all night
upon the tree, but thou shalt in any wise bury him that day; (does that
ring a bell? Why were the Jews in such a hurry to get Jesus off the Cross? They
knew this verse!) (for he that is hanged is accursed of God;)..."
Did you know that was in your Bible? Now let's go back to I Corinthians and
that will probably make more sense. Paul is admonishing, especially in the
direction of Jewish unbelievers who were giving Christianity such a bad time,
and reflecting, I think, in his own pre-salvation experience. He was literally
telling Israel that this Man, Jesus of Nazareth, was accursed because he was
hanged on the Cross, on the tree. Paul is making it so plain here in I
Corinthians 12 that no man who is now a believer and under the control of
the Holy Spirit would ever call Jesus accursed simply because He'd been
crucified. We know better than that, but you see the Jews were leaning on
Deuteronomy, and what Judas had done, and so they were calling Jesus accursed.
But they were not doing it in the power of the Holy Spirit, they were doing
it in their unbelief. The reason I'm making a point of this is because
years ago this verse bugged me. I thought how in the world could anybody curse
Jesus? But this was their reasoning. Now let's go on and look at the last part
of verse 3.
I Corinthians 12:3b
"...and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, (and
really mean it) but by the Holy Ghost."
Now that's the other side of the coin. No unbeliever can ever claim that Christ
is His Lord, it's impossible. Christ can never be the Lord and Master of an
unbelieving person.
_______
LESSON TWO * PART III
ETERNAL EXCELLENCE OF LOVE
I CORINTHIANS 12:1 - 14:3
Continuing on in I Corinthians Chapter 12, and verse 3, in the last half of the
verse where it says:
I Corinthians 12:3b
"...and that no man can say that Jesus is the Lord, but by the
Holy Ghost."
In other words an unbeliever may say it, but it doesn't amount to
anything because there is no genuine belief in his heart. The only person that
can genuinely claim Christ as Lord is the believer. Come back to Romans Chapter
10 and look at a Scripture that goes with this verse.
Romans 10:8,9a
"But what saith it? (that is, the Scripture) The word
is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith,
which we preach; That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord
Jesus,..."
Now that's where the term comes into its full meaning. That as a believer, now
we know that Jesus is Lord. He's in control of our life, He is the One
in Whom we eat and sleep and move and without Him we are nothing. So that is
what Paul is referring to back here in I Corinthians Chapter 12:3b. Now back to
I Corinthians to continue the study. So only a truly saved, born again
individual, a believer, can make the statement with all sincerity of the
heart, because the Holy Spirit is the One that is the evidence that indeed
Jesus is Lord.
I Corinthians 12:4a
"Now there are diversities of gifts,..."
Later on in this chapter Paul is going to introduce now for the first time in
his writings this concept of the "Body of Christ." That invisible from
the human element, that invisible make-up of all believers who have been
baptized (spiritually) into that Body of Christ, and we'll see it laid out in
more graphic terms beginning with verse 12. But here he's just saying, `That in
the Body of Christ every one of us has a particular role." Every one of us have
been saved for a particular place of service. It may be some dear lady who
never is able to get out of her house, she is very seldom seen by the public at
large, she may be a busy housewife and mother, but she can be a prayer warrior.
She can accomplish more for God without being seen than many evangelists who go
from pulpit to pulpit. And so we have to remember that every believer has that
unique capability of serving God as He intended it. Now I'm going to make a
point here in a moment that we are not to beg for a particular gift. We are not
to ask for it because that has to be discerned and given as the Holy Spirit
wills it and not as we determined it, and we'll be getting to that in a couple
of verses.
I Corinthians 12:5
"And there are diversities of administrations; (absolutely, and in
dispensations - the other word for administrations) but the same
Lord."
God is the same over all. In fact I've broken it down this way. When Adam and
Eve were in the Garden, they were under a certain set of circumstances. The
only thing they had to concern themselves with was "Don't eat of that
tree," and that was it, because everything else was there for them to
enjoy. There was nothing that would be disobedient to them, they knew nothing
of sin, but they were not to eat of the tree. Well you know what happened, they
disobeyed and they ate. Now the point I'm trying to make is that when they came
out of the Garden of Eden, was everything still the same? No! It couldn't be.
Sin and death had entered. They had been separated from that daily walk with
God, and so there was a whole different set of circumstances. They were then
under the curse, they had to work by the sweat of their brow, they were no
longer under the easy existence of Paradise, and Eden. So it was all different,
but had God changed? No, God didn't change, but rather Adam and Eve did.
That leads all the way up to the flood, and Noah and his family go into the
ark. Now when they come out of the ark after the flood, again, is it like it
was when Adam and Eve came out of the Garden? No way. Everything was different
again, God laid other responsibilities upon them as they could kill the
animals and eat the meat. Before the flood they couldn't do that, so it was
a different administration. Then comes along the Tower of Babel, and you know
what happened there. All the people around Babel were scattered by virtue of
their languages now, and they all went to different parts of the then-known
world. Different than before? Absolutely! Had God changed? No!
And then God raised up Abraham and does something totally different, and
promises this one man a Nation of people, a different set of circumstances?
Absolutely. The same God? Absolutely. And then God brought in Law, and He says
to the Nation of Israel, "Keep the Law." We had never had anything on
the planet like that before, but now Israel was under the Law. Then comes along
the Age of Grace, this great Gospel that you and I proclaim that anybody,
black or white, rich or poor, Jew or Gentile can now enter into God's salvation
by just simply believing the Gospel (Ref. I Corinthians 15:1-4) this had
never been on the planet before. So it's a different administration, but has
God changed? Not a bit. So this is what Paul is referring to in verse 5. A
change of operations? Absolutely, but it's the same God. Verse 6:
I Corinthians 12:6,7
"And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same
God which worketh all in all." Now verse 7 is the verse that I was
referring to a few minutes ago about asking for gifts. You take the gift that
God has given you, and you be content with it. Look what he says.
"But the manifestation (putting it in the spotlight) of the Spirit is
given to every man to profit withal." Now let's just go down to verse 11
and you'll see the same thought repeated.
I Corinthians 12:11
"But all these (the things that he has listed up there in
verses 8, 9 and 10) worketh that one and the selfsame Spirit, dividing to
every man severally (differently) as he (the Holy Spirit)
will."
Do you see that? So it's not for you and me to go and say, "Oh I want this
gift, or that gift," No, you just take the gift that God has given you. Now I
think the greatest thing we can do is just simply say, "Lord here I am, I'm
available, use me." And let Him direct you where He want to use you. I've
told people this for years that I don't wait for God to say something out loud,
He's never spoken to me out loud, but I'll tell you how He talks to me, and
that's with open and closed doors. He gets us just exactly where He
want us. If something doesn't fly and the door closes, don't push against it,
you just take it that God doesn't want you in that direction. You will find
another open door someplace else so just take that one. And then from the
Word, His Word can just impress you so much. Another one is by
prayer, and that's some of the ways that we can find what God wants. But
just to simply go to God and say, "I want the gift of such and such, no I
don't think this is what the Bible permits. We are to leave that up to the
Holy Spirit. Now I don't want to skip any verses or I'll get a call saying,
"Well, you copped out." Now verse 8:
I Corinthians 12:8
"For to one (believer in the congregation) is given by
the Spirit the word of wisdom; (that's a gift to have wisdom) to another
the word of knowledge (but it's going to come) by the same Spirit;"
See, these were things that the Church needed, and God is providing then
with these particular abilities. Now verse 9:
I Corinthians 12:9
"To another faith by the same Spirit; (now whether you
know it or not, if you're a believer where did you get the wherewithal to
believe the Gospel? From the Holy Spirit, because it's a gift, and as we
exercise that gift of faith we respond by believing. Also some have greater
faith than others and there's nothing wrong with that.) to another the gifts
of healing by the same Spirit;"
There's no doubt they exercised this gift in the early Church. We know that
even Paul himself exercised this gift in the Book of Acts as he performed
miracles. But by the time you get to his later letters there's not a word about
these kind of miracles, and he doesn't perform them himself. One of his best
friends, and fellow laborers in the work was sick on the island of Miletus, and
was nigh on to death, but could Paul heal him? No. So what did he admonish the
believers to do? The same as we do today; pray for him. And we know that
Timothy evidently had a stomach ailment, and we know Paul didn't heal him, he
gave him a remedy for it, but he didn't heal him. And it was the same way with
many of his own catastrophes in his life experience. Did he get healed? No. The
Lord brought him through them, but no sign of any miraculous healing. In this
area of Scripture, remember, that it's only in the letter to this carnal
Corinthian Church that he deals with these particular gifts. Now let's finish
verse 10:
I Corinthians 12:10
"To another the working of miracles; to another prophecy; to
another discerning of spirits; (to determine whether it's true or whether
it's false) to another divers kinds of tongues; (languages) to
another the interpretation of tongues: (or those languages)"
Go to Ephesians Chapter 4, one of his prison epistles. It was written several
years later, and he now has that revelation that I think he was referring to in
I Corinthians Chapter 13. Now the steam has been wiped off the mirror, and he
now has the complete revelation, and he is teaching here in Ephesians the
position of the believer in the Body of Christ. If people would only look at it
this way. This is where we are today! This is like coming out of 3rd and
4th Grade arithmetic, and ending up in higher mathematics. The electrical
engineering that puts all our computers and everything together takes a lot of
smarts. They didn't forget simple mathematics, but they have put all that
behind them. That is exactly where I put the Book of Ephesians. Ephesians is
like somebody with a PH.D. in mathematics or physics.
Ephesians 4:4-10
"There is one body, and one Spirit, even as ye are called in
one hope of your calling; One Lord, one faith, one baptism," (not three, as
a lot of people are depending on, and that's not what the Book says now as you
can see. We've moved on into another administration or dispensation) One God
and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all. But unto
every one of us (from the greatest to the least He has given these gifts of
the Spirit that He lists here.) is given grace according to the measure of
the gift of Christ. Wherefore he saith, `When he ascended up on high, he led
captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men. (Absolutely He did.) [Now
that he ascended, what is it but that he also descended first into the lower
parts of the earth? He that descended (that of course was in His three days
and nights that He was in the tomb) is the same also that ascended up far
above all heavens, that he might fill all things.]'" Look at the gifted men
he gives to the Church in verse 11.
Ephesians 4:11
"And he gave some, apostles; (and they even faded off the
scene after the apostolic age ended. We don't have apostles in the Church
today, but they were part of it even when he was writing Ephesians.) and
some, prophets; (they also faded away because we now have the printed Word.
Once the Word came into print there was no longer a need for gifted men to
speak forth the Word, but even so, Paul still lists them here in Ephesians. Now
here's where we are today.) and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and
teachers;"
Those are the three basic gifts that the Church needs today. Men who are
evangelists and can preach salvation, and probably going from place to place,
we all understand the role of an evangelist. And then there's the man who is
the gifted person to be a pastor. We know that not all of God's men can be
pastors, and not all can be teachers. But these are the three basic gifts that
are explained here in the Book of Ephesians, and now look also at verse 12. Why
did God give the Church these three categories of people?
Ephesians 4:12
"For the perfecting (the maturing of believers, getting
away from the milk bottle, and learning to eat the meat of the Word) of the
saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of (not for the
evangelist, pastors, and teachers, but for whom?) the body of Christ:"
Now I've maintained for years that the primary purpose of the Church (and I
don't care what denomination that is), is to so feed its members that those
members can go out and become soul winners among the world in which they live.
That's the way they did it in the early Church. They didn't have great
evangelistic campaigns, they didn't have great coliseums full of people, but oh
listen, they turned the Roman Empire upside down. And how did they do it? By
just simply every believer being taught from the Word that he could be a living
testimony to the world around him, and this is the criteria for us today. Oh,
to be so taught in the Word that you can be a testimony wherever you go,
whoever you are. I don't care how little education that you have, you can be a
gifted person in God's program for today.
Now back to our study. So we did have these gifts in Corinthians that Paul
doesn't mention again in the Book of Ephesians. And just come to your own
logical conclusion. For the same reason that you don't go back and use 3d &
4th grade arithmetic books when you're up in higher mathematics. It's the same
way here, because these things are now left in the background and we move on to
the greater gifts that Paul brings out in Ephesians and other prison epistles.
Now verse 12, and here in this verse, even though the Body of Christ as a
doctrine is brought to its fullest forte in the prison epistles, it doesn't
mean that Paul knew nothing of it because here he introduces us to it. Here we
have the description of the Body of Christ. Now I know there are a lot of
people who do not understand this concept that every true believer is a member
of the Body of Christ. As I've said before, Jesus never once mentioned the
Body of Christ. The Body of Christ is a term that you cannot find in the
Four Gospels. You can't find Peter using this term either, because that term
was only given by revelation to the Apostle Paul in this Age of Grace. Now here
it comes.
I Corinthians 12:12
For as the body (this human body from which he's going to
draw a comparison or allegory) is one, and hath many members, and all the
members of that one body, being many, are one body: so also is Christ."
("so also is Christ" is referring to the Church or Body of Christ)
Here we are with a human body of ten fingers and toes, our ears, and eyes, and
all the functions of this physical body, but where is the control of these
fingers and toes? Up in our brain. So also is the Body of Christ. We are now
members of the Head Who is in heaven, and that's why that's where our
citizenship is. That's where the Head is, that's where the nerve center is. So
Paul says by inspiration that we believers are members of that one Body of
Christ. How did we get there?
I Corinthians 12:13
"For by one Spirit (the Holy Spirit again, as it's a capital
`S.') are we all (notice that says all. Not just the most
spiritual, not just the ones that have had an emotional experience, but every
true believer regardless of where he is or how great experience he's had, we
are all members of the Body of Christ because the Holy Spirit has) baptized
into one body, (Now you see there's not a word about tongues here, and yet I
maintain this is the only time that Paul teaches a baptism by the Holy Spirit.
When we are saved the Holy Spirit immediately places us in the Body of Christ,
it's a baptism, and there is no water involved. But rather the Holy Spirit did
it, and that of course is our guarantee that we are Christ's and He is ours.
Now reading on:) whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or
free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit."
Remember that a believing Jew is a member of the Body of Christ, and they will
be taken out at the Rapture of the Church just like the Gentiles will. And
that's what so unique about it. Everyone who has become a believer of the
Gospel (Ref. I Corinthians 15:1-4) has been made to drink into that one Holy
Spirit. And then Paul goes on to say:
I Corinthians 12:14
"For the body is not one member, but many."
We are part of the many into the one whole, and that's the whole picture of the
Body of Christ. That's why you can go from here to Timbuktu and if you get into
a fellowship of believers you're never a stranger. Anywhere Iris and I have
gone, when we go into a home of believers, we don't feel strange for a moment,
because there's a oneness we have in Christ. Then Paul goes through and uses
all the bodily members to show the example, and he's belaboring the